How I feel about Chemerinsky’s Con Law supplement.

wheninlawschool:

  1. crimsondude reblogged this from wheninlawschool and added:
    Hmm. It seems that I must be the only person who doesn’t like Chemerinsky, both at my law school and inferring through...
  2. faithandmimosas reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  3. truth-about-lawschool reblogged this from wheninlawschool and added:
    TRUTH
  4. triskelionbees reblogged this from sassyskeptic
  5. sassyskeptic reblogged this from eatpraylaw and added:
    YES.
  6. eatpraylaw reblogged this from lizbert
  7. arihaz reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  8. hjaybee reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  9. anarchkitteh reblogged this from wheninlawschool and added:
    oh this is true. got my highest 1L grade solely because of this gem.
  10. miss-malllla reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  11. fromcindy reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  12. pemanah reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  13. spectralprongs reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  14. allmirthnomatter reblogged this from melissaruns262
  15. batmarg reblogged this from lawgeeks
  16. lawgeeks reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  17. melissaruns262 reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  18. uninhibitedimagination reblogged this from wheninlawschool
  19. lizbert reblogged this from wheninlawschool and added:
    I have literally referred to it as such. Literally the only reason any of us had any idea what our Con Law professor was...
  20. legally-awesome reblogged this from wheninlawschool and added:
    That is truth…with that being said…I AM GLAD I AM A 2L AND DON’T HAVE TO TAKE CON LAW EVER AGAIN!!! MUAHAHAHAH
  21. wheninlawschool posted this

Quantcast